Hose Diagramdefinitions

SIMON AND SIMON

Today we address the following article Simón Royo Hernández ,

News from the immaterial labor IV. The intellectual work of the Nobel Prize for Literature: Sartre, Pasternak and Günter Grass

(rebelion.org, 01/07/2007)

***
Dear Bloggers

Royo, We have stated on many occasions that Simón Royo rant only knows about itself. At this point you know that your little article with a mirror Her autoidolatría shamelessness that embarrasses all who lose their time reading. But the case before us today borders on the paranoid ... masks used this time to hide his face in each paragraph are Sartre, Pasternak

and Günter Grass. That is, that these gentlemen talk about what is really doing is writing about himself. And is that Simón Royo
begins to have dreams of Nobel Prize

. What we lacked.

This article

The intellectual work of Nobel prizes Literature: Sartre, Pasternak and Günter Grass

is concocted of such a way as to include biased, as is usual with him, those messages anarcho-communism propaganda as his nursery school and that we are truly fed up with its simplicity and silliness.

*** You may have noticed that Simon Royo feel some fondness for phrases like Toni Negri ("immaterial labor l") or the Marx ( time of universal venality ") found - why umpteenth time? - in this paper. Our haggard middle-aged to think that if repeated as if I had Tourette syndrome

will become

Boris Pasternak. Poor thing ...

To honor

Simon and his parrot syndrome, we have titled today's post with another of his favorite expressions, which also appears here: "Basilisk

drool." Do not know what should happen when Simonet discovered that little word "surely has in mind magazine called precisely Gustavo Bueno so Basilisk - but since then uses it with remarkable oral fixation. Basilisk means "the king of snakes" in Greek and Christian circles is often used as an emblem of evil "in the universe simonesco means everyone except him. It is very curious that one of the characteristics of the basilisk is just the stench of his breath Which Reminds us Simon's stutter and yellowish teeth ... More

start from the beginning ...

*** Simón Royo I wish to convey a message very very deep: that intellectuals should be judged jointly by his work and his life . The scholar is required to move beyond the intellectualism phlegmatic to embody in the example of their own actions. So Simonet explains that "before"-in the golden age of Satya Yuga pre-capitalist-non-fiction awards were much more authentic than the Nobel Prizes of XX and XXI centuries. Herder mentions , Schopenhauer and Rousseau as coherent intellectual exponents of their era.

Rousseau, Rousseau again ... Here is an example! We assume The Royo-Bloggers you have at heart the aforementioned biography of apostle of tolerance and education Edenic. Juan Jacobo married a maid and seamstress named Thérèse Levasseur, with whom he had five children. His own offspring was not as well treated as "Emilio" novel and sent to Hospice of terrible Enfants-trouvés. Great gesture if we consider that in those days even had an infant mortality rate exceeding 80%. Oh, these intellectuals encouraging abortion to their partners or ignore their children. A magnificent specimen, yes sir. Right, Simon ?

noble After finishing this stage of humanity, capitalism spawned heinous, among other cataclysms, the institution of the Nobel Prizes . Of course it is undeniable that Fortune obtained by dynamite is questionable, but systematically extend the macula of the doubt until the winners seems a bit overdone. We also agree with Simon many awards, especially those of literature and peace-are contaminated by political inclinations and, therefore, we can discuss its relevance or not, the same way that we can question the allocation of grants won by graduate plug meanest politicking. Right, Simon ? With this rhetoric, Simonet tells us that the only awarded the Nobel are deserving of respect and

Pasternak

Sartre as:

Reasons the rejection of such a large and prestigious

both are subject to hermeneutic guesses on the conscience of intellectual, then adding one more, at least very likely, those concerned with speculation about the subjectivity of the great men worthy to undertake actions, we propose to consider

that such refusal could well have an intimate relationship with the general principles of a communist art.

Anyway, here begins the drift of your item. But let us first evaluate the figure of Sartre

and then we look at the hapless

Pasternak.

***

seems not worth trying on the work of Jean-Paul Sartre sufficiently known to all "ad nauseam."

However, as Simonet speaks of the coherence between the work and intellectual life, it might be interesting to go over the path close to the famous existentialist squint. To do this, we suggest reading the book tasty Hazel Rowley entitled

Sartre and Beauvoir.

story of a couple, published by Lumen. That is when we realize the hypocrisy of those figures that are revered in proportion to the degree of pettiness private. Many liberals say that they practiced "free love" or they were not constrained by the "moral decadence of bourgeois society." One can take a suburban lot with anyone, in this blog have always defended the happiness and choice each sex, "but hide behind the freedom does not justify the repeated psychological abuse of people or hurt them with free amoral. The aristocratic feminist bisexual and licentious toad destroyed the lives of many people who "believed" in them, especially the lives of their students, which humiliated and exchanged abject psychological advantage in playing games of his renown academic and political status. Not to mention the cowardice of Sartre when

Michelle Vian, ex-wife of Boris Vian

, and he aborted it, meanwhile, was so richly trip leaving her alone in a trance so hard for any woman. A true sign of ethics and integrity. Right, Simon ?

*** Finally we have to talk about Boris Pasternak . Either would add to the impeccable personal and artistic career of this gentleman. Great poet, translator master Shakespeare and Rilke -work had to be undertaken by economic urgency due to pressure from the regime that forbade him to publish his own work as normal, and, of course, the unforgettable novel author Dr . Zhivago. What happens here is that Simon Royo as a brazen lie by asserting that:

The greatest hero of rejection towards the purchase and sale of works of art by twentieth-century capitalism was undoubtedly Pasternak, whom the

capitalist slander when they say he refused the prize for fear of being deported

. Do we slander to Pasternak

? Hell, Simon

, how can you drop a rotten lie of this magnitude and stay so calm? Need only consult the Wikipedia and found that Pasternak wrote

Not one but two letters to the Swedish Academy. In the first humbly expressed his happiness for the prize:

immensely thankful, touch, proud, astonished, abashed.

(Immensely thankful, touched, proud, surprised, embarrassed)

However, the pressure exerted by the Soviet regime made him change his mind. In his second letter to the academy said

Considering the Meaning Has Been Given this award in the Society to Which I Belong, I reject this undeserved Must Which Has Been Presented prize to me. Please Do Not Receive Voluntary my rejection with displeasure.

This fact can be corroborated in dozens of encyclopedias, websites, biographies, and manuals. But

Simonet has a unique and privileged information "provided by perhaps

catervita of Rebellion and anarcho-communist cronies living with that dares to deny another simonástrico revisionist exercise, this and other hardships suffered under the tyranny of Josef Stalin

.

Speaking of Nobel prizes, how not to remember in these times of Orhan Pamuk

who had to leave Turkey

by repeated threats made against him, his family and friends? But Don Royo

never devoted an encouraging word to a character who struggle for modernity, democracy and equality ...

*** Simón Royo little article concludes with a couple of cautionary paragraphs anticapitalist which I transcribed below (look in the

"basilisk"

):

all know that among some intellectuals awards sometimes third the Tongo by shopkeeper editorial intervention, especially when the good ones are held in capitalist lands. So always whisper the gossip in the intellectual, the ones everybody talks bad about everyone and where, between lying basilisk and creeping slime insult bestiary, is said occasionally some truth such as, for example, between the famous awards Anagram Test, it is always better than the winning runner.

And ...

Only a person with weight and authority or similar to those medium and large things have been written is legitimate to give an opinion on them and not for the sake of respect of outdated hierarchies but by current evidence. The slander

is a great sport in the world egotistical and narcissistic and entertainment capital, television and parliament are a bad example, something else to throw up poisons that recipient. For all the putrid slime basilisks, as they are, is to assert what Socrates once said: no wonder that the donkeys bray or often they release a kick. Nor should we wonder if we braying or coceamos, but strange and unacceptable is that we bray the wise. [...]

It ridiculous to them a society like ours, the mass

sheep of consumer capitalism, in which any "

idiotes

" - in the etymological sense of the Greek word, which only indicates to any individual, he thinks he has the right to judge those who are not. The reason is that the world worship the golden calf is no longer judged as a citizen before the tribunal of reason, but as a client in the court of the consumer, a larger sample and a demonstration palpable that the place of politics has taken the market. A disturbance with dire consequences in all spheres of life.

Uy, uy, uy ... You're not talking about us? Right, Simon

? Because I criticize you with the same right to criticize you, insult and attack everyone else.

*** Misspellings:

We have to congratulate you Simonet. P t seems that today was your spelling Microsoft with some skill. Yet misspell:

Über die * *

Wille in der Natur Schopenhauer as it should be

Über den Willen in der Natur

. Oh, that German! When will a short course in the Goethe Institut

funded with some of those scholarships that give you?